Deep Dive into the Historical Crisis of March 2026: Policy Perversion and the Onset of the "Japan Sell-off"

 

Deep Dive into the Historical Crisis of March 2026: Policy Perversion and the Onset of the "Japan Sell-off"

1. A "Structural Inevitability" Surpassing October 2008

The shockwaves that hit the Japanese market at the end of March 2026 extend far beyond the scope of a temporary risk-off phase. As the attached data indicates, the Nikkei 225 plummeted by 13.2% for the month, while the TOPIX fell by 11.2%. The weight of these figures is profound. They suggest that a structural "crustal deformation" is underway—one that rivals or even exceeds the panic selling seen immediately after the Lehman shock in October 2008.

 

The Decisive Difference from 2008

The 2008 crisis was an external shock that rippled into Japan—a "global disappearance of demand" and "liquidity drain" originating from the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis. However, the essence of the current crash lies in the exposure of "internal vulnerabilities." By doubling down on "Sanaenomics" without an exit strategy for Abenomics, Japan’s economic foundation had been hollowed out. The flashpoint was the Trump administration’s strike on Iran, which triggered a staggering 51.3% monthly surge in WTI crude oil. The external shock was merely the "spark"; the explosives themselves had been piling up within Japan for years.

 

The "Triple Slump" Signals a Collapse of Credit

The most notable aspect of March's performance was the "triple slump"—the simultaneous selling of stocks, the yen, and bonds.

• Yen (USD/JPY): Depreciated 1.7% monthly (approaching the 160 range).

• Bonds (10-year JGB): Yields spiked from 2.10% at the end of last month to 2.34% (prices fell).

• Stocks: Crashed by over 13%, as previously mentioned.

Typically, in a stock market downturn, capital flees to the safety of the yen or government bonds. This time, capital fled from all of them. This is not a liquidity crisis; it is evidence that a "re-pricing of the Japanese system itself" has begun—a critical situation where both currency value and national credit are being eroded simultaneously.

---

2. The Policy Perversion of "Sanaenomics"

This "structural inevitability" was invited by a stubborn adherence to past success stories, continuing to floor the accelerator despite a radically changed environment.

 

Incongruity Between Environment and Policy

When Abenomics began, the primary enemies were a strong yen and deflation; policies aimed at a weaker yen and higher stock prices possessed a certain logic. However, the environment in 2026 is in a completely opposite phase: "severe yen depreciation, imported inflation, and labor shortages."

 

To push through "Sanaenomics"—further strengthening fiscal expansion and monetary easing under these conditions—is nothing short of a "policy perversion," both economically and historically. As WTI surpassed $100 and cost-push inflation hit the public directly, the cost of "doubling down" has been condensed into these March figures.

 

Fall from 60,000: Collapse of the Castle in the Air

As the Nikkei approached the 60,000 milestone toward the end of February, I warned that it was "structurally overvalued and headed toward 30,000." At the time, the market was dominated by excessive expectations for Sanaenomics and the euphoria of excess liquidity, but the real economy (the quality of corporate earnings and household purchasing power) had failed to keep pace.

The year-to-date (YTD) data shows the Nikkei 225's gains have been shaved down to a mere 1.4% (TOPIX at +2.6%), meaning the entire first-quarter profit was wiped out in a single month. This "speed of reversal" proves just how fragile the foundation of the 60,000-yen price point truly was.

---

3. This Morning’s "53,000" and WTI: A "Fleeting Dream"

This morning, the market caught its breath on expectations of a "Trump TACO," with the OSE night session eyeing the 53,000 mark. However, this is nothing more than a "momentary life extension" on the edge of a cliff.

 

WTI as the Cold Judge

Expectations for an autonomous recovery in the Japanese market are akin to an illusion. The almost solitary determining variable is energy prices—specifically, the movement of WTI crude.

As the data shows, WTI has seen an abnormal rise of 51.3% for the month and 76.6% YTD. For an energy-importing nation like Japan, this cost increase entrenches a structural current account deficit and yen weakness, burning out the corporate profit base from the inside. As long as WTI remains in the $100 range, no matter how vigorous this morning's rebound appears, it is likely the final struggle of a "brain-dead" system.

 

Countdown to 30,000: Transition to the Monitoring Phase

The resurgence of the "TACO trade" this morning is merely short-covering by speculators betting on Mr. Trump’s whimsical remarks. While the market is temporarily recovering "price," investors should truly be watching the "collapse of value."

Now that the "structural overvaluation" created by policy perversion has exploded upon meeting the massive flashpoint of high oil prices, the trend has completely reversed. The historical scars of March's 13% drop will not be easily healed.

 

Conclusion

The crash of March 2026 is a historical turning point where the "long feast of Abenomics"—specifically the "double-down tactics" of Sanaenomics—began its liquidation at the worst possible timing and under the worst external conditions (high oil and Trump-driven volatility).

The "restless buying" seen in this morning's TSE morning session is far too powerless to mask the structural vulnerabilities. We have finished the phase of oscillating between joy and sorrow over momentary rebounds. We have now entered the stage where we must calmly monitor the "beginning of the end"—the cold reality of the "return to 30,000" that I foresaw at the beginning of March.

“Japan’s Real Oil Reserves Are Less Than Half of What Is Claimed”

 

“Japan’s Real Oil Reserves Are Less Than Half of What Is Claimed” 

In last night’s Ichigetsu Mansatsu program, journalist Akira Sato highlighted an important article by energy analyst Noboru Iwase published in PRESIDENT Online. Based on publicly available information, I have reorganized the key points below as a summary rather than a quotation.

The analysis is highly persuasive and extremely valuable.

1. Questioning the Premise: Is the “254 Days of Reserves” Really True?

The Japanese government and media repeatedly state that Japan has “254 days of oil reserves.” However, the Financial Times reports that Japan effectively has only 95 days of reserves. Iwase argues that this discrepancy arises from two issues:

• the true nature of what is counted as “reserves,” and

• the assumptions used for Japan’s daily oil consumption.

2. What the 254 Days Actually Consist Of

According to the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (as of January 2026):

Category	Volume	Days	Issues
National reserves	41.77M KL crude + 1.42M KL products	146 days	Oil type/quality undisclosed
Private-sector reserves	12.78M KL crude + 15.0M KL products	96 days	Likely “operational inventory,” not true reserves
Joint reserves with oil-producing nations	1.91M KL	6 days	Ownership belongs to producing countries; unclear if usable in emergencies

 

Total: 72.89M KL = 248–254 days (official figure)

However, most of the private-sector “reserves” are actually operational inventory required for normal refinery and distribution operations—not emergency stockpiles.

3. The Unrealistic Consumption Assumption: 1.8 Million BD

The government’s calculation implies Japan consumes only 1.8 million barrels per day (BD).

But BP/EI statistics show:

• 2005: 5.38M BD

• 2015: 3.99M BD

• 2024: 3.25M BD

Japan’s actual consumption remains around 3 million BD, making the government’s assumption far too low.

Correcting the assumption:

• 254 days → effectively about 152 days

• Excluding private operational inventory → only about 103 days

4. Private-Sector “Reserves” Are Actually Operational Inventory

Oil companies must maintain at least 60 days of inventory for stable operations. Thus:

Private-sector reserves = operational inventory, not emergency reserves.

They cannot simply be released during a crisis.

5. Joint Reserves with Oil-Producing Countries: Uncertain Usability

• Ownership belongs to Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

• Japan is allowed to count only “half” as reserves.

• Contracts are not publicly disclosed.

• Both countries lie inside the Strait of Hormuz, and their supply capacity is constrained during the current closure.

It is unclear whether Japan could actually use these reserves in an emergency.

6. Lack of Transparency in National Reserves

• The types and qualities of crude oil stored are not disclosed.

• Historically, Japan purchased large volumes of unpopular heavy crude (e.g., Khafji) for reserves.

• Auction details for reserve releases are far less transparent than in the U.S.

7. LNG Is Even More Critical: Long-Term Storage Is Physically Impossible

LNG must be kept at −162°C and naturally evaporates over time. Japan’s LNG inventory equals only 2–4 weeks of annual consumption. Unlike Europe or the U.S., Japan has almost no underground gas storage facilities.

8. The Core Issue: Government’s Desire to “Avoid Worrying the Public”

Iwase argues that Japanese administrative culture prioritizes:

“Small reassurance” over “large-scale safety.”

Examples include:

• The Fukushima accident’s independent investigation reached the same conclusion.

• The Basic Energy Plan devotes only two pages to public communication.

• TV networks openly say “energy issues don’t get ratings.”

As a result, the public hears only the comforting “254 days” figure, without understanding the underlying reality.

9. Conclusion: Japan Must Face the Reality of Being an Energy-Poor Nation

Iwase’s central message:

Japan’s real oil reserves are not 254 days, but 100–150 days at most. The structural vulnerability must be communicated honestly, and energy security must be rebuilt.

At the same time, Japan is a nation that achieved a miraculous postwar recovery through ingenuity and effort. Recognizing the facts clearly is the first step toward building better energy policy.

**Weekly Report “Sanae Shock: Japan Has Entered an ‘Infinite War of Attrition’”**

 

**Weekly Report

“Sanae Shock: Japan Has Entered an ‘Infinite War of Attrition’”**

Sanae Shock: Japan Has Been Drawn into an “Infinite War of Attrition”
— Market Psychology Dominated by Noise × Fiscal Year-End Supply–Demand × The Finite Game of Great-Power Politics —
 

 

March 29, 2026
Tomo Nakamaru
Former World Bank Economist

---

1. Market psychology is no longer driven by “information” but by “noise”

What moved markets last week was neither economic indicators nor corporate earnings. It was the amplification of noise.

As Fischer Black explained, markets contain three elements:

• Information (genuine signals)
• Noise (random disturbances)
• Fake (intentional falsehoods)

In 2026, these three have become entangled in the worst possible way.

Noise that dominated last week’s markets

• Disinformation surrounding Trump’s attack on Iran
• Exaggerated reporting on the closure of the Strait of Hormuz
• Politically motivated leaks about Japan’s fiscal situation
• Fragmented “crisis” narratives spreading on social media
• AI algorithms generating mislearned trading signals

Together, these pushed the market into a phase where it reacts not to information, but to fear.

Fear moves markets faster, deeper, and more brutally than information.
The result:

A triple decline in stocks × yen × bonds.

---

2. March 30–31: The worst possible timing after breaching crisis lines

Japan’s market is entering an extremely unusual fiscal year-end supply–demand environment.

(1) Friday, March 27 was the final day for “year-end dividend capture”

• Many investors bought stocks to secure dividend rights
• This made stock prices appear artificially high

In other words:

The Nikkei falling only 1% below its 200-day moving average may have been window dressing.

Given that the Nasdaq is 6% below its 200-day line,
a cold-eyed view of the market would say:

The Nikkei should be another 5% lower.

(2) March 30–31: “Ex-dividend drop” + “year-end rebalancing”

This is the most dangerous combination for markets.

• The Nikkei will automatically fall by several hundred points due to ex-dividend adjustment
• GPIF, insurers, banks, and foreign investors will sell for rebalancing
• Yen depreciation and rising rates may trigger additional bond selling

Fiscal year-end supply–demand could become the trigger that accelerates the Sanae Shock.

---

3. Crisis-line breaches: The structure of “Japan selling” is now complete

Last week’s market data signals not a mere correction but the ignition point of a structural crisis.

(1) Nasdaq: 6% below the 200-day moving average

Global risk assets have shifted into “escape” mode.

(2) Nikkei 225: 1% below the 200-day line (effectively −6%)

Dividend-capture window dressing likely distorted the numbers.

(3) USD/JPY at 160 (structural danger line)

A negative spiral has begun:

Yen depreciation → import inflation → rising interest rates → JGB selling → further yen depreciation

(4) WTI at $100 (a fatal blow to Japan’s economy)

Higher energy import costs → current-account deficit → accelerated yen depreciation.
In real terms (deflated by US CPI), the historical peak is around $200.

(5) Japan 10-year yield at 2.4% (early signs of a JGB market revolt)

Doubts about fiscal discipline are surfacing.

The simultaneous occurrence of these signals leaves only one conclusion:

The Sanae Shock has reached the crisis threshold.

---

4. Trump’s attack on Iran and Sanae Takaichi’s surprise dissolution share the same structure

There is a key to understanding this week’s market turmoil.

(1) Both were surprise moves aimed at “winning a finite game”

• Trump: attacking Iran for domestic political gain
• Takaichi: dissolving parliament to boost approval ratings

Both are tactics designed to maximize short-term victory.

(2) But state governance is inherently an “infinite game”

• Fiscal sustainability
• Market confidence
• Diplomatic stability
• Stability of citizens’ livelihoods

All depend on long-term continuity—the infinite game.

(3) Victory in the finite game becomes the seed of defeat in the infinite game

• Trump’s attack → higher oil prices → global inflation → Japan’s current-account deterioration
• Takaichi’s surprise dissolution → loss of fiscal discipline → JGB selling → rising interest rates

The result erupted last week as:

Japan selling (crisis-line breach).

---

5. Diagram: Great-power nationalism always fails in the infinite game

Great-power behavior
→ Displays of prestige (military buildup, attacks, surprise moves)
↓
Short-term victory (finite game)
→ Higher approval ratings, temporary market euphoria
↓
Long-term costs
→ Fiscal deterioration, currency instability, JGB selling
↓
Market revolt
→ Stock decline × yen decline × bond decline (triple decline)
↓
Defeat in the infinite game
→ Loss of national sustainability

---

6. Sanae-nomics accelerates defeat in the infinite game

Sanae-nomics attempts to recreate Abenomics’ double-down strategy (monetary easing + fiscal expansion) under inflationary conditions.

This is a classic pattern:

Pursuing finite-game victory (short-term stimulus)
→ Triggering infinite-game defeat (fiscal collapse, currency instability).

Key elements include:

• Rapid expansion of defense spending
• Opaque funding sources
• Interest-rate suppression
• Policy reduced to social-media popularity contests
• Lack of policy explanation

Markets have already begun to conclude:

“Japan has abandoned the rules of the infinite game.”

---

7. Conclusion: Japan has been drawn into an “infinite war of attrition”

Last week’s market behavior is a warning:

Japan has lost the sustainability required for the infinite game and has entrusted national governance to short-term finite-game victories. The result is a steady erosion of long-term stability.

The three most important indicators for Japan going forward are:

• Long-term interest rates
• The yen exchange rate
• JGB supply–demand dynamics

Great-power nationalism always fails in the infinite game.
And the cost of that failure concentrates on the most vulnerable nation.
Today, that nation is Japan.

---

**Appendix: The “New Three Arrows” to Accelerate Future Creation

— The Only Path to Prevent a Volcker-style Shock**

A supply shock cannot be overcome through monetary easing or fiscal expansion.
What is required is an integrated approach combining demand restraint and supply enhancement.

Policy	Objective	Civilizational Significance
First Arrow: Monetary Normalization	Gradually move real interest rates into positive territory; anchor inflation expectations; prevent violent rate hikes.	Restore central bank credibility; exit discretionary policymaking.
Second Arrow: Abolish the Consumption Tax	Deliver a positive supply shock to revive domestic demand and reduce export dependence.	Create a Japanese model for overcoming supply shocks.
Third Arrow: Abolish Industrial Policy	Eliminate state-created vested interests; promote creative destruction in markets.	A civilizational shift from great-power nationalism to small-nation sustainability.

🔵 Episode 15 The Mechanism of Military Expansion and Civilizational Collapse — Why Civilizations Fall Through Militarization New Series: Japan Will Be Reborn as a Small Nation Civilizations collapse when military expansion becomes an end in itself.

 

🔵 Episode 15

The Mechanism of Military Expansion and Civilizational Collapse — Why Civilizations Fall Through Militarization

New Series: Japan Will Be Reborn as a Small Nation

Civilizations collapse when military expansion becomes an end in itself.
This is not a historical accident but a structural inevitability of civilizations.

The Roman Empire, the Qing Dynasty, the Soviet Union, and the Empire of Japan—
all were destroyed by the hypertrophy of their military systems.

Far from strengthening the state, military expansion erodes the basic vitality of a civilization—
its population, finances, currency, and narrative—
and shortens its lifespan.

Modern Japan is now entering this same structure.

---

1. Military Expansion Does Not Protect Civilization — It Is a “Cancer Cell” That Ages It

Military expansion is supposed to be a means to protect the state.
But once it grows uncontrollably within a civilization,
it transforms into an end in itself.

From the perspective of civilizational theory,
this is nothing less than a “cancer cell” born inside the civilization.

Characteristics of Cancer Cells

• Self-replicating
• Invading surrounding tissues
• Disrupting original functions
• Ultimately killing the host

Military expansion behaves in exactly the same way.

It erodes public finances,
militarizes the population,
rigidifies the national narrative,
and amplifies fear of external threats.

Military expansion does not protect civilization.
It accelerates its aging.

---

2. Military Expansion Destroys Fiscal Autonomy — Shortening the Lifespan of Civilization

The single most important factor determining a civilization’s lifespan is
its fiscal autonomy.

Fiscal autonomy is the civilization’s “life-support system,”
allowing it to extend its own lifespan.

Military expansion destroys this system.

Military spending is a “permanent expenditure”

Once increased, it cannot be reduced.
This strips the civilization of flexibility.

Militarization rigidifies public finances

Funds are diverted away from:

• Education
• Science and technology
• Social security
• Infrastructure

These are the foundations of civilizational vitality.

Rigid finances are a precursor to collapse

Rome, the Qing Dynasty, and the Soviet Union
all collapsed after fiscal rigidity set in.

Modern Japan, too, is losing fiscal autonomy
through its doubling of defense spending.

---

3. Military Expansion Militarizes the Population and Destroys Civilizational Flexibility

Population is the engine of civilization.
But military expansion treats this engine as a mere “military resource.”

A militarized population loses diversity

• Militarized education
• Militarized industry
• Militarized values

Once the population is absorbed into the military sphere,
civilizational flexibility disappears.

Military expansion under population decline is “civilizational suicide”

A shrinking population combined with military expansion
rapidly erodes civilizational vitality.

Modern Japan is heading toward the worst combination:
population decline × military expansion.

---

4. Military Expansion Rigidifies the National Narrative — The Return of Great-Power Ideology

Military expansion hardens a civilization’s narrative.

• “A nation must be strong or it will perish.”
• “We must prepare for external threats.”
• “We must restore national power.”

These are all variations of the Black Ship complex.

Once the narrative hardens,
the civilization loses the ability to face reality.

Both the militarism of the Shōwa era
and the great-power ideology of the Reiwa era
fit this pattern.

---

5. Military Expansion Amplifies Fear of External Threats — The Reproduction of Fear Narratives

Military expansion amplifies fear of external pressure.

• The Russian threat
• The Chinese threat
• The North Korean threat
• Geopolitical risk

All of these are used as “fear narratives”
to justify military expansion.

Yet the Tokugawa shogunate treated external pressure as a learning opportunity.
Military expansion turns external pressure into fear.

Fear narratives rigidify civilization.

---

6. History Repeatedly Shows That Military Expansion Destroys Civilizations

History is full of examples where military expansion led to collapse.

Roman Empire

Military overspending → fiscal collapse → division

Qing Dynasty

Military bias → fiscal rigidity → delayed modernization

Soviet Union

Arms race → economic collapse → state dissolution

Empire of Japan

Military expansion → fiscal breakdown → catastrophe

Military expansion does not protect civilization.
It destroys it.

---

7. Modern Japan Is Entering the Structure of “Civilizational Collapse Through Militarization”

Modern Japan is entering the same structure seen in the Meiji and Shōwa eras.

• Doubling of defense spending
• Dependence on government bonds
• Currency deterioration
• Amplification of external-threat narratives
• Re-expansion of great-power ideology

This structure is astonishingly similar to Shōwa Japan.

When the structure is the same,
the outcome is the same.

---

Conclusion: Military Expansion Is a Structure That Shortens the Lifespan of Civilization

Military expansion does not strengthen the state.
It ages the civilization.

It destroys fiscal autonomy,
militarizes the population,
rigidifies the national narrative,
amplifies fear of external threats,
and re-expands great-power ideology.

All of these
shorten the lifespan of civilization.

And modern Japan
is once again entering this structure.

**The Ghost of Great-Powerism and Hemingway — From 1935 to Contemporary America, and Japan’s “Sanaenomics”**

 

**The Ghost of Great-Powerism and Hemingway

— From 1935 to Contemporary America, and Japan’s “Sanaenomics”**

 

In 1935, Ernest Hemingway sensed the shifting atmosphere of the world and wrote:
“The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war.”

The aftershocks of the Great Depression, the rise of fascism, monetary expansion, and the emphasis on external enemies—
what he saw was the recurring habit of civilization when a nation falls into anxiety.

And today, in our own time,
the narrative of “greatness” rises cyclically in the United States,
while in Japan, a new discourse known as “Sanaenomics” is drawing attention.

When a nation becomes anxious,
what kind of stories do people cling to,
and what kind of language does politics choose?
Using Hemingway’s warning as a guide,
let us read the current positions of America and Japan through the long arc of civilizational history.

---

1｜Why did Hemingway declare in 1935: “Inflation or war”?

Hemingway was a writer acutely sensitive to the smell of war.
Not because he was well-versed in politics,
but because he was sensitive to the smell of political lies.

At eighteen, he was sent to the Italian front, blown apart by artillery fire,
and learned that the government’s propaganda of a “heroic war”
was in reality nothing more than a mixture of mud, blood, and screams.

So when he looked at the world of 1935,
he must have felt a sense of déjà vu.

The world was suffering from the aftereffects of the Great Depression,
and nations began speaking of “greatness,” “external enemies,” “armament,” and “currency.”

Hemingway must have thought:
“Ah, it’s starting again.”

And thus the famous line was born:

“The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war.”

This was not mere political criticism.
He saw the recurring habit of civilization.

---

2｜Why does civilization become intoxicated by Great-Powerism?

Looking across the history of civilization, one finds a strange rhythm.

When a nation grows tired, when its economy stagnates, when people become anxious,
voices proclaiming “greatness” begin to rise from nowhere.

“Protect our borders.”
“External enemies threaten us.”
“We can become great again.”

This pattern repeated in ancient Rome, in the empires of the 19th century,
and in Europe of the 1930s.

Great-Powerism is like a spell
that transforms anxiety into pride.

But that spell often comes with side effects—
inflation and military expansion.

Hemingway knew these side effects all too well from the First World War.

---

3｜The scent of Great-Powerism drifting through modern America

In contemporary American politics,
a Great-Powerist narrative appears cyclically.

This is not about any specific individual,
but about the structural tremors inherent in a vast nation like the United States.

When the economy wavers,
when immigration issues flare,
when international competition intensifies,
America begins to speak of “greatness.”

• Strengthening borders
• Emphasizing competition with foreign nations
• National revival
• Externalizing domestic discontent
• Fiscal expansion and protectionist policies

These resemble the structural features of Great-Powerism in the 1930s.

What Hemingway perceived was
the typical reaction of a great power in a state of anxiety.

---

4｜And now to Japan: What does “Sanaenomics” represent?

Turning to Japan,
the term “Sanaenomics” has emerged in recent years,
and its policy ideas and messaging have drawn attention.

What matters here is not whether it is “good” or “bad,”
but where it sits within the long arc of civilizational history.

Debates around Sanaenomics often involve themes such as:

• National self-reliance
• Strengthening defense capabilities
• Economic security
• National pride
• External threats
• The role of fiscal policy
• Emphasis on national “revival” or “strength”

These are typical elements of Great-Powerist narratives
seen in many countries around the world.

Of course, Japan’s context differs from that of America or 1930s Europe.
But viewed through the long lens of civilization,
the pattern of narratives that emerge when a nation is anxious
is strikingly similar.

---

5｜The stories summoned by Japan’s anxiety

Japan now faces population decline, geopolitical tension, economic stagnation,
and questions about the very shape of the nation.

In such anxious times,
a nation often seeks a “story.”

“A strong Japan.”
“An independent Japan.”
“A proud Japan.”

These function as psychological pillars
to ease the public’s anxiety.

The attention given to Sanaenomics likely reflects
a longing for such national narratives.

---

6｜What would Hemingway see?

In 1935, Hemingway watched a world trembling with anxiety,
as nations began speaking of “greatness,” “external enemies,” “currency,” and “armament,”
and he must have thought:

“This is a matter of human psychology.”

When a nation becomes anxious, it:

• Emphasizes external enemies
• Seeks pride
• Speaks of greatness
• Expands fiscal spending
• Covers economic pain with a narrative

This pattern appears not only in 1930s Europe,
but also in contemporary America,
and in modern Japan.

Debates around Sanaenomics can be understood as
one such narrative that emerges when a nation is shaken by anxiety.

---

7｜Conclusion: Does Hemingway’s warning resonate in Japan?

In 1935, Hemingway watched nations become intoxicated
by stories of “greatness” amid global anxiety,
and he issued a warning:

“Inflation and war are the panaceas of a mismanaged government.”

This was not aimed at any specific country or politician.
It was a diagnosis of the psychological structure
that civilizations repeat when they fall into anxiety.

And that structure casts a quiet but unmistakable shadow
over contemporary America
and over Japan’s policy debates.

When a nation trembles with uncertainty,
what future do we choose?
What stories do we believe?

Civilization’s rhythm may not be changeable.
But we can become aware of that rhythm.
Hemingway’s words remain before us today
as a light to illuminate that awareness.