Sunday, October 19, 2025

October 2025 Monthly: The "Gilded Age" Takaichi Trade and the Trump TACO Trade Collide

 

October 2025 Monthly: The "Gilded Age" Takaichi Trade and the Trump TACO Trade Collide

 

Monday, October 20, 2025

 

The Market Flocks to Fashionable Trends

 

The Out-of-Control Narrative Economy and the Foreshadowing of the Collapse of Civilization

 

Amid the triple whammy of a weak yen, inflation, and a bubble, policy can no longer be seen as driven by "narratives." The market reacted to the Abenomics double-down, accelerating the "Takaichi Trade." Meanwhile, in the United States, "TACO," a derisive term for Trump's negotiating tactics, became a buzzword. Financial markets appear to be dancing in a bubble, driven by reflexes that follow current trends, emotions, and simplified decision-making rules (heuristics).

 

What is the Takaichi Trade?

 

The Takaichi Trade is an investment behavior in which the market overreacts to the proactive fiscal and monetary easing policies of Prime Minister-elect Sanae Takaichi, resulting in a simultaneous weakening of the yen, rising stock prices, and falling bond prices. This is a market pattern in which policy expectations take the lead, piggybacking on "Sanaenomics," which can be seen as a doubling-down on Abenomics, a policy that has already proven to be a failure.

 

What is the TACO trade?

 

On the other hand, TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) is an acronym that mocks the pattern of Trump's tough statements, followed by a market crash, a conciliatory stance, and a market rebound. The market incorporates repeated threats and compromises, resulting in short-term risk-on and -off cycles.

 

Fads eventually fade.

 

However, there are inherent risks inherent in the high-market trade, particularly. First, it relies on the way policies are communicated rather than their effectiveness, and political uncertainty could lead to a sudden reversal. Above all, there are concerns that continued simultaneous easing of fiscal and monetary policy will further accelerate inflationary pressures in Japan.

 

TACO also has its perils. Lack of policy consistency exacerbates market instability, and taking positions based on a "complacent" approach could undermine institutional trust.

 

Gold Price Skyrocket and Signs of Civilizational Collapse

 

Ultimately, both the "high market trade" and "TACO" depend more on the way policies are communicated than on their substance. This demonstrates that markets are driven by narratives, not systems, and heralds the arrival of an era in which adaptability prevails over efficiency.

 

The classic "efficient market hypothesis," which holds that markets are always correct and efficient, is on the wane, and the heuristic "adaptive market hypothesis" is increasingly taking center stage among market participants. In particular, last Thursday's surge in gold prices (hit $4,375.80 per ounce, up 65.7% year-to-date) should be interpreted not simply as a flight of assets, but as a sign of institutional fatigue and the collapse of civilization amid a loss of confidence in fiat currencies.

 

In particular, gold prices have been soaring since Federal Reserve Chairman Powell's speech at Jackson Hole this summer. This is not simply a hedge against inflation risk; it must be seen as incorporating an implicit scenario of distrust in fiat currency, institutional fatigue, and the collapse of civilization.

 

 

Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0 will collide due to a "prisoner's dilemma."

 

Unfortunately, both Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0 are policies based on "inward-looking economic nationalism." While they aim to stimulate the economy in the short term, prioritizing domestic interests, in the long term they will likely lead to a prisoner's dilemma through currency and trade wars, and both Japan and the United States are likely to suffer losses due to xenophobia reminiscent of the former anti-foreigner ideology.

 

Sanaenomics vs. Trump 2.0: Similarities and Differences

 

The policies of both parties share the following similarities:

Item: Sanaenomics Trump 2.0

Fiscal Policy: Active fiscal policy (tax cuts and increased spending); Permanent tax cuts (corporate tax cuts)

Monetary Policy: Pressure on the Bank of Japan to curb interest rate hikes and interference with its independence; Pressure on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates and interference with its independence

Trade Policy: Promoting exports by inducing a weaker yen; Correcting the trade surplus through increased tariffs

Economic Nationalism: "Reclaiming Japan" and "America First"

 

Both advocate "our country first," but their approaches are deployed on different battlefields: a currency war (Japan) and a trade war (US).

 

Win-Win or Prisoner's Dilemma?

 

Ideally, Japan and the United States should build a "win-win" relationship in which their respective demands complement each other's. However, the reality is that the following structural risks exist:

Currency war vs. trade war: Yen manipulation worsens the U.S. trade deficit, while Trump's tariffs hinder Japanese exports.

Prisoner's dilemma: As each country strengthens its own national policies, there is no room for cooperation, ultimately resulting in losses for both sides.

Institutional fatigue: Central bank independence is undermined and fiscal discipline collapses, leading to a loss of long-term credibility.

 

Gold price surge: A sign of the collapse of civilization.

 

In October 2025, gold prices surpassed $4,000 per ounce for the first time in history, recording a 50-65% increase since the beginning of the year. This is not simply an inflation hedge; it has deeper implications, including:

Devaluation of the dollar and currency distrust: BRICS countries are increasing their gold purchases, and confidence in U.S. Treasuries is declining.

Limits of the system: Politics is eroding the independence of the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan, calling into question the sustainability of the monetary system.

Civilizational transition: Historical parallels include the sudden rise in gold prices during the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Spanish Empire, and the Tokugawa Shogunate (during the Meiji Restoration).

 

Gold is a "stateless currency" and a mirror image that acts as a harbinger of institutional collapse.

 

Toward the final chapter of the narrative economy.

 

Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0 both drive markets through "narratives," but when those narratives erode confidence in the system, gold becomes a last resort. The end of civilization may come not with the collapse of the system, but with the end of the story.

 

 

 

"The surest way to destroy capitalism is to debase currency."

 

Lenin's words, quoted by Keynes in "The Economic Consequences of the Peace," "The surest way to destroy capitalism is to debase currency" ring almost prophetic in the face of today's inflation and skyrocketing gold prices.

 

The Fuse of Currency Debasement: Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0

 

Both policies have the potential to accelerate the "debasement of currency," which undermines institutional credibility.

Sanaenomics

Yen Weakening: Pressure on the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates and expansionary fiscal policy have weakened the yen's purchasing power.

Dilution of Fiscal Discipline: Simultaneous spending sprees have led to the normalization of fiscal deficits.

Institutional Fatigue: Conflicts with the bureaucracy have intensified, leading to a loss of policy consistency.

 

Trump 2.0

Politicization of the Dollar: Interference with the Federal Reserve, pressure to lower interest rates, and a desire to weaken the dollar.

Rekindling of the Trade War: Inflationary pressure and supply chain disruptions due to increased tariffs.

Fiscal Expansion: Increased debt due to permanent tax cuts and increased military spending.

 

Both policies have a structure that "stimulates the economy at the expense of the currency's value," a perfect example of the "institutional collapse caused by the debasement of the currency" that Lenin warned about.

 

Lenin's Warning and the Modern-Day Fuse

 

Lenin's words, "The debasement of currency is the surest way to destroy an institution," are no longer merely a historical aphorism but are becoming a reality as the consequences of modern policy. Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0 will be the fuse, and the brilliance of gold will serve as a mirror reflecting the decline of institutions. The end of civilization may begin with the collapse of currency.

 

History Ruled by Chance: The Asymmetry of the Meiji Restoration and the Civil War

 

Without the Civil War of 1861, the United States might have been more proactive in its foreign affairs and might have been able to provide more stable democratic support to Japan at the end of the Edo period.

 

The Second French Empire also supported Japan in military technology and institutional reforms at the end of the Edo period, while mitigating the hegemonic competition between Britain and France.

 

If such international cooperation had functioned properly, Japan might have pursued "enriching the country and enriching the people" rather than "enriching the country and strengthening the military," and chosen democratic modernization rather than imperialism.

 

This is not a case of "there are no ifs in history," but rather a perspective that history is a chain of chances and choices, a series of probabilistic branchings.

 

Contemporary Coincidence: The Risk of a Dark Situation in Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0

 

Both accelerate the "narrativization of institutions," and unpredictable, contingent events (political events, war, financial crises) could potentially cause the collapse of institutions and the downfall of civilization.

 

This could lead to institutional exhaustion and a return to a mythical order, as in the "Eejanaika Ranbu" (dance dance) and the "Sonno Joi" (revere the Emperor, expel the barbarians) frenzy.

 

The outcome could be a self-destructive choice for Japan and the United States, or the reconstruction of a new narrative—we stand at this crossroads.

 

At the Intersection of Coincidence and Institutions

 

History is a chain of coincidences, and institutions are the devices that transform those coincidences into narratives. In both Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0, when their narratives transcend institutions, coincidences no longer represent hope but a harbinger of downfall. However, it is precisely in a world ruled by chance that we have the freedom to choose again.

 

 

 

The striking similarities between the "Eejanaika" dance of the late Edo period and the modern-day gold dance

 

Incidentally, common people at the end of the Edo period danced wildly to the "Eejanaika" amid monetary chaos (a three-fold difference in the domestic and foreign prices of gold and silver during the isolation period, followed by a massive outflow of gold and inflow of silver after the country opened up) and hyperinflation, amid soaring prices (rice prices soared approximately eightfold from the end of the Edo period to the Meiji Restoration). This was not just a festival; it was an expression of a loss of faith in the system and a return to a mythical order.

 

The modern-day gold price surge may also be manifesting as a "gold-shining dance" amid a wavering trust in legal tender and a flight to gold, the currency of an institutionalized era.

 

Sonno Joi and the Excess of Revolutionary Ideology

 

Sonno Joi was an ideology that combined a return to a mythical order (the emperor) with xenophobia in response to external pressure (the arrival of the black ships) and institutional failure (the shogunate's financial collapse).

 

This enthusiasm overthrew the pro-opening faction (pro-shogunate, pro-rationalism) and gave rise to the revolution known as the Meiji Restoration. However, history teaches us that the subsequent pursuit of national wealth and military strength and imperialism ultimately led to self-destruction in the recent war.

 

The brilliance of gold signals the decline of institutions.

 

The current surge in gold prices is a sign that credibility in institutions is eroding and narratives are becoming excessive.

 

When "narrative policies" like Sanaenomics and Trump 2.0 drive markets without institutional backing, it marks a return of the "Eejanaika" ("What's the Big Deal?") movement. Like the Sonno Joi (Revere the Emperor, expel the barbarians) craze, this could signal institutional collapse and revolution.

 

Risk of Isolation and Self-Destruction and Civilizational Choices

 

If Japan were to once again be consumed by the "narrative enthusiasm" and lose institutional rationality, the isolation and self-destruction seen during the recent war could be repeated. The brilliance of gold could be a bell announcing the death of institutions and the revival of myth.

 

 

 

. Coalition Talks Leave "Politics and Money" Behind—The Future of an Administration Prioritizing Interests Over National Interests

 

The Mainichi Shimbun's editorial, "LDP-Ishin Coalition Talks: Will 'Politics and Money' Be Left Behind?" dated Saturday, October 19th, hits home the current political situation. It's highly persuasive and truly serves as a wake-up call.

 

The LDP-Ishin Coalition Talks portend the birth of a system that prioritizes privileges and interests over national interests. Their rush to enter power while shelving the fundamental issue of political funding transparency will only deepen distrust in politics, far from gaining public trust.

 

The Ishin Party's 12 policy demands include a ban on corporate and organizational donations. However, Yoshimura, the party's leader, stated, "The LDP will never say yes," demonstrating no commitment to making this a reality. This was also the primary reason Komeito distanced itself from the LDP.

 

Despite the Ishin Party's proposal being stricter than the Komeito proposal, it has been left out of the core of the negotiations. This attitude undermines the credibility of the Ishin Party, which advocates political reform. The inclusion of a reduction in the number of Diet seats as an "absolute condition" raises suspicions that this is a tactic to divert the discussion from the issue of political funding.

 

The sub-capital plan, too, is ostensibly intended as a backup function in the event of a disaster, but its true intention is to revisit the "Osaka Metropolitan Government Plan," which was rejected twice in the past. As for social security reform, there are concerns that reducing insurance premiums will lead to a decline in the quality of medical services.

 

Meanwhile, the LDP's efforts to gain a majority are outrageous. The formation of a new parliamentary group with Takashi Tachibana's "Party to Protect the People from NHK" undermines the foundations of democratic politics. Cooperating with individuals who repeatedly spread information of unknown veracity undermines the integrity of the administration.

 

Japan has experienced the 40 years since the Plaza Accord (1985) as a "lost era."

 

Sanaenomics, which could be described as a doubling down on Abenomics, has failed to achieve either price stability or sustainable growth, and is instead accelerating the quadruple whammy of a declining birthrate, stagnant consumption, a weak currency, and rising prices.

 

As the people continue to be exploited, is Japan destined for ruin? This question has become a real one. In an era of multi-party politics, coalition negotiations are inevitable. However, we must not neglect fundamental issues related to trust in politics. Compromises should be made on policy details, not political ethics.

 

 

Acknowledge the True Risks to the Global Economy in an Era of Monetary Illusion

 

A Nikkei editorial (October 16th, Thursday) characterized the Trump administration's reciprocal tariff policy as "the greatest risk to the global economy." However, this perspective is based on monetary illusion. While tariffs are certainly a contributing factor, concluding that they are the greatest threat misunderstands the true nature of currency and purchasing power.

 

The U.S. has already agreed to a maximum 15% tariff rate on Japan. Meanwhile, the dollar-yen exchange rate exceeds 150 yen against purchasing power parity (1 dollar = 108 yen), representing a depreciation of the yen by approximately 39%. In other words, effective price adjustments through exchange rates are already underway, offsetting the impact of tariffs.

 

Trade and currency are two sides of the same coin, and discussing tariffs in isolation is tantamount to misinterpreting the economic picture.

 

The Japanese Economy's "Quadruple Woes" ​​and the Monetary Illusion

 

The greatest risks facing Japan in 2025 are the following quadruple woes:

The collapse of the population structure due to a declining birthrate

Weakening domestic demand due to prolonged consumption stagnation

Loss of purchasing power due to currency depreciation

Difficulties in daily life due to rising prices

 

These are real hardships that cannot be captured by nominal indicators. Despite this, the "monetary illusion"—driven by superficial figures like a weak yen and rising stock prices—is distorting public perception.

 

Gold Price Skyrocketing and Collapse of Currency Confidence

 

As already mentioned, the real risk to the global economy is the collapse of currency confidence, symbolized by the abnormal rise in gold prices. As of October 16, gold (gold) recorded $4,375.80 per ounce, up 65.7% since the beginning of the year. This is not simply a flight of assets, but a collapse of fiat currency itself. This is a sign of distrust in things.

 

In particular, the sharp rise in gold prices since the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole meeting on August 22 is an unusual and alarming phenomenon.

 

The "eye of the storm" in this global currency depreciation trade is none other than Japan's "high market trade," which aims to weaken the yen and boost stock prices.

 

An uncontrollable doubling down: The dangers of Sanaenomics

 

With inflation exceeding 2% for 41 consecutive months since April 2022, "Sanaenomics," which aims to double down on Abenomics, is nothing more than a rehash of policies that failed to achieve price stability and sustainable growth. The vicious cycle of a weak yen, inflation, and a bubble has spiraled out of control, putting Japan on the brink of economic collapse.

 

IMF Outlook and Its Blind Spots

 

The IMF has revised its global growth forecast for 2025 upward to 3.2%. Some believe the impact of Trump's tariffs "isn't as shocking as initially anticipated." However, structural risks, such as a rekindling of US-China tensions, the collapse of the AI ​​boom, and immigration restrictions, remain unmanifest.

 

The pessimistic scenario also suggests that global GDP could decline by 1.2% in 2026. In other words, now is the time for countries to stop settling for a lull and instead rebuild international cooperation to prevent a chain reaction of currency, trade, and hegemony collapses.

 

Conclusion: Clearing the Fog of Monetary Illusion

 

Japan is now on the front lines of global economic risk. Rather than Trump tariffs, the real risk we must face is the inherent crisis caused by monetary illusion and policy fallacies.

 

*Monetary illusion: A psychological tendency to be confused by nominal monetary changes and misjudge real changes in purchasing power and living standards.

 

Tomo Nakamaru, Former World Bank Economist

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

The Double-Down Delusion

 

“The Double-Down Delusion: How Reflationist Overconfidence Threatens Japan’s Economic Stability”


A Morning of Disbelief

This morning’s Reuters article left me speechless.
The sheer overconfidence of Japan’s reflationist camp—untethered from evidence and steeped in arrogance—is beyond comprehension.
It is no longer a matter of debate, but a matter of national peril.

41 Months of Inflation and the Fourfold Curse

Since April 2022, the Japanese government and Bank of Japan have allowed inflation to exceed 2% for 41 consecutive months.
This prolonged inflation has deepened Japan’s “fourfold curse”: declining birthrates, stagnant consumption, currency depreciation, and rising prices.
All are direct consequences of the misguided continuation of reflationary policies since Abenomics.

The Limits of Wakatabe’s Expertise

Masazumi Wakatabe, former Deputy Governor of the Bank of Japan and now professor at Waseda University, is a scholar of economic history—not open macroeconomics.
With all due respect, it is doubtful he even grasps the Taylor Principle as taught by Harvard’s Gregory Mankiw: that policy interest rates must remain above the inflation rate in real terms.
This is not a minor oversight—it is a fundamental blind spot.

Reflationists’ Irresponsibility and the Rise of Sanaenomics

The reflationist camp has consistently refused to acknowledge its errors, revealing a bottomless irresponsibility.
Now, Sanaenomics—under newly elected LDP President Sanae Takaichi—threatens to double down on these failed policies.
This reckless amplification of reflationist dogma could accelerate inflation, inflate asset bubbles, and push Japan toward economic ruin.

Just as it did in a previous war.

The Dangerous Path Ahead

By autumn of Reiwa 7 (2025), Japan marks 80 years since the end of World War II.
Yet today, the nation faces a new kind of conflagration:
An inflationary gap (aggregate demand > aggregate supply), a weakening yen, surging prices, and a swelling bubble—all fueled by the dangerous double-down tactics of the reflationists.
Japan risks losing control, while ordinary citizens may be burned by the flames of soaring living costs.

 

A Nation at the Crossroads

Japan stands at a critical juncture.
The double-down delusion of Sanaenomics threatens to unleash a vicious cycle of inflation, asset bubbles, and currency collapse.
If left unchecked, this path could lead to systemic failure and widespread hardship.

It is time to confront the errors of the past, reject the arrogance of the reflationists, and restore responsible economic stewardship—before the flames consume us all.

This Week's Weekly: Sanaenomics: Thatcher or Truss? An Iron Lady or a Short-Lived Floating President?

 

This Week's Weekly: Sanaenomics: Thatcher or Truss? An Iron Lady or a Short-Lived Floating President?

 

Monday, October 6, 2025

 

   "The Birth of Sanaenomics and the Future of Japanese Politics—Interpreting the Nikkei Editorial"

 

Opening: Evaluation of the Editorial and Raising Issues

 

The Nikkei editorial dated Sunday, October 5, titled "Takaichi Urgently Calls for Political Revival to Overcome Difficulties: Questions to Ask in the LDP Presidential Election," is a relatively persuasive argument, but it must be said that it is not without its problems.

 

Indeed, the election of the first female LDP president (and perhaps the first female prime minister) in Japan's constitutional history carries symbolic significance. In a world where hereditary succession is rampant in LDP politics, the breaking down of this system in the recent presidential election held the day before is undoubtedly a step forward.

 

However, the two major scourges of privilege and vested interests remain deeply rooted. It is far from certain that a change in party leadership alone will restore public trust; structural reform is essential for true political revival.

 

Political stability is impossible without economic stability.

 

Political stability cannot be achieved without price and currency stability, as well as sustainable economic growth. Price stability and economic growth are often in a trade-off relationship, and the roots of current instability lie in the fourfold hardship facing the Japanese people: (1) a declining birthrate, (2) long-term stagnant consumption, (3) a depreciating currency, and (4) rising prices.

 

Amid 41 consecutive months of inflation exceeding 2% since April 2022, the government and the Bank of Japan have continued to exploit the general public doubly—or, more accurately, triply, if the multiplied burden of these two factors is included—with a 10% consumption tax and a cumulative inflation tax of over 8%.

 

It is no exaggeration to say that propaganda that ignores the reality that wage increases are not keeping up with rising prices is tantamount to deception.

 

The Inherent Contradiction of Sanaenomics

 

New Governor Takaichi's "responsible active fiscal policy" is nothing more than a rehash of Abenomics, and her disregard for the normalization of monetary policy is extremely dangerous.

 

At a press conference held on the evening of the day following the presidential election, she made radical statements that go against the accepted wisdom of modern macroeconomics, such as "the government is responsible for both fiscal and monetary policy." This statement is reminiscent of U.S. President Donald Trump's "arrogant ignorance."

 

The fundamental stance of Sanaenomics, which continues the late Prime Minister Abe's statement that "the Bank of Japan is a subsidiary of the government," is a dangerous sign that the basic principle of fiscal and monetary independence is being undermined.

 

A Warning from a Historical Perspective

 

The late Kazutoshi Hando (former editor-in-chief of Bungeishunju), widely regarded as an explorer of the history of the Meiji Restoration and the Showa era, pointed out the "three major flaws of Japanese leadership"—1) unfounded self-confidence, 2) arrogant ignorance, and 3) unfathomable irresponsibility—and it must be said that these flaws continue to cast a shadow over our country's politics.

 

If Sanaenomics reproduces these flaws, Japan could fall into chaos on a par with the 2022 Truss Shock in the UK (a major macroeconomic policy error triggered a triple collapse in financial markets, resulting in a sharp rise in interest rates, a fall in stock prices, and a depreciation of the currency, resulting in the short-lived administration of the Conservative Party, Truss, lasting only 44 days).

 

The Nikkei Editorial's Points and Limitations

 

While the editorial emphasizes the significance of Takaichi as a female president, it must be said that it does not delve deeply into her ties with the former Abe faction or the issue of "politics and money." Furthermore, while he advocates for "wise spending" in economic policy, he has not sounded sufficient warnings about the risks of expanding government spending.

 

On the diplomatic front, while expressing concern about visits to Yasukuni Shrine and conservative behavior, he has expressed hope for a summit meeting with President Trump. However, he has not mentioned any concrete strategies for rebuilding the Japan-U.S. alliance.

 

What is Needed to Steering in a Time of Poor Visibility

 

I have previously warned that, regardless of who is elected in the LDP presidential election, the new administration will be short-lived if it simply prolongs Abenomics.

 

However, with addressing rising prices becoming one of the biggest political challenges, the birth of Sanaenomics, which further stimulates aggregate demand through the twin engines of fiscal and monetary policy and could further fuel an inflationary spiral—a vicious cycle of wages and prices—was unexpected. Regrettably, Japan is now increasingly caught in the storm and visibility is becoming increasingly poor.

 

Now is the time for truly innovative measures to achieve both essential political revitalization and sustainable economic stability. Genuine reform and ideological renewal are required.

I strongly hope that new President Takaichi will manage politics based on the true national interest and public opinion, avoiding the mistakes of the Truss Shock.

 

However, while it is truly regrettable, the new LDP president has a baseless, blind, or even overconfident belief that the Japanese economy is still in "deflation," so it may be wise to recognize that dialogue with the general public and the Bank of Japan is no longer viable.

 

It is safe to say that the Japanese economy is now on the verge of complete fiscal dependency. Bank of Japan President Ueda, who is seen as politically illiterate, will be easily repressed, and there is no choice but to conclude that there is a very real risk that inflation and the weak yen will continue to worsen.

 

 

Reconsidering the editorial: "Accelerating Price Rise: We Must Address the Pain of Households"

On the other hand, the October 4th Tokyo Shimbun editorial deserves praise for its empathy for households suffering from rising prices and its stance of urging political action. However, its specific policy discussions contain several issues that cannot be overlooked. Therefore, I would like to critically examine it from the following four points.

 

Abolishing the provisional gasoline tax rate poses environmental risks.

 

While abolishing the provisional tax rate would help reduce logistics costs, there are concerns that it will encourage fossil fuel consumption and accelerate global warming.

 

Despite a medium-term downward trend in crude oil prices in dollar terms, the main reason gasoline prices in Japan remain high is the weak yen. Therefore, the more fundamental solution is to stabilize the exchange rate rather than abolishing the tax rate.

The Bank of Japan must acknowledge "underlying inflation" and expedite the normalization of monetary policy.

 

The current situation, with inflation exceeding 2% for 41 consecutive months, is precisely what the Bank of Japan has denied: "underlying inflation." As the guardian of prices and the currency, the Bank of Japan should swiftly normalize monetary policy through gradual interest rate hikes in response to inflation exceeding the 2% target.

 

Fiscal handouts lead to a vicious cycle of inflation and fiscal collapse.

 

Repeated fiscal spending responses to rising prices could lead to a wage-price spiral, and a loss of credibility due to a widening fiscal deficit. A sustainable system design is required, rather than short-term popularity-seeking measures.

 

A consumption tax rate cut would be more immediate and fair than a tax credit with benefits. While a tax credit with benefits is one option, there is a long lag between system design and implementation, making it less effective.

 

A permanent reduction in the consumption tax rate to 5% would take less time to implement and would address the double whammy of a declining birthrate and stagnant consumption. Discussing an abstract theory as a price control measure, without knowing its impact relative to GDP, is itself fraught with illogical flaws.

 

While appreciating the editorial's intention, we call for more refinement of the policy argument.

 

The editorial's empathy for households' pain and its stance of holding politicians accountable are highly commendable. However, the details of the policy need to be reconsidered from the perspectives of the environment, finance, fiscal policy, and institutional design. Price control measures must not simply be symptomatic treatments, but must incorporate a structural perspective and be sustainable.

 

 

3. "Pursuing Strong Domestic Demand to Overcome Tariff Concerns" - A Critical Interpretation of the Nikkei Editorial

 

The title of the Nikkei editorial dated Thursday, October 2nd, was "Pursuing Strong Domestic Demand to Overcome Tariff Concerns," which was encouraging. Unfortunately, however, the editorial's content lacks a basic understanding of macroeconomics and is marked by a persistent insistence on corporate-led domestic demand expansion, which has drawn harsh criticism. Macroeconomic Perceptions and Policy Divergence

 

The current Japanese economy is showing clear macroeconomic signs, including:

Inflation above 2% for 41 consecutive months

Five consecutive quarters of positive growth compared to the previous quarter, leading to an inflation gap (aggregate demand > aggregate supply) of +0.3%, according to Cabinet Office estimates

The Bank of Japan's Tankan survey also improved for two consecutive quarters, indicating solid business sentiment

 

Under these circumstances, what's really needed is a policy mix of monetary tightening and fiscal expansion: (1) normalization of monetary policy (interest rate hikes) and (2) a permanent reduction in the consumption tax rate to 5%.

 

Despite this, the Nikkei editorial fails to offer any such idea, instead pinning its hopes solely on business-led domestic demand expansion. This attitude clearly demonstrates a lack of understanding even the most rudimentary of macroeconomics.

 

Consumer-led domestic demand expansion is the key to a growth strategy.

 

A permanent reduction in the consumption tax rate to 5% is the most powerful growth strategy, creating a virtuous cycle of consumption and capital investment.

Sustained growth cannot be expected from preferential treatment for specific industries, which is not the invisible hand of God but the "dirty hands" of vested interests with party tickets.

 

The policies of the LDP administrations under Suga, Kishida, and Ishiba thus far, which can be seen as a rehash of Abenomics, have repeated the following three mistakes:

 

Excessive monetary easing through negative real interest rates

 

Unlimited fiscal spending

 

An inefficient growth strategy based on nepotism

 

These policies, under the false banner of wage increases that can keep up with rising prices, expose the structural limitations of an LDP administration where hereditary succession, privilege, and vested interests are rampant. No matter who is elected president in last weekend's general election, it is inevitable that this administration will be short-lived.

 

Japan-US Tariff Policy and the Direction of Spending Shift

 

If, as the editorial states, we are overly concerned about the negative impact of the Trump administration's tariff policy, then shifting spending toward consumer-led, rather than corporate-led, expansion of domestic demand is the key to aligning with the US's policy of expanding net exports and building a win-win relationship that expands the economic pie for both Japan and the US.

 

Unless we learn from the lessons of the Plaza Accord and change our excessive reliance on large exporting companies, we cannot deny the risk of falling into a policy of impoverishing our neighbors through currency depreciation competition and once again self-destructing.

 

Now is the time to not miss this golden opportunity to achieve price stability and sustainable growth through a virtuous cycle of consumption and capital investment.

 

 

Thatcherism and Sanaenomics: Ideology and History Running Contrasting

 

Incidentally, Takaichi Sanae's positioning of former British Prime Minister Thatcher (1979-1990) as the "ideal politician" can be understood as a superficial admiration for "conservatism" and "strong leadership." However, when we look at the substance of their policy philosophies, the two are almost polar opposites.

 

Thatcherism, as a standard-bearer of neoliberalism alongside Reagan, thoroughly promoted "small government," "deregulation," "privatization," and "balanced budgets." She eliminated state intervention as much as possible and emphasized competition and efficiency based on market principles.

 

Sanaenomics inherited the Abe administration's state-capitalist framework and is rather a typical example of "big government," with its bold monetary easing, active fiscal policy, industrial intervention under the guise of a growth strategy, and the preservation of vested interests and nepotism. Its advocacy for the integration of fiscal and monetary affairs is the direction Thatcher most wary of.

 

Ignoring such ideological differences and insisting on "following Thatcher" is political rhetoric that lacks respect for history and ideals, and it is no exaggeration to call it a bad joke.

 

It is truly regrettable, but perhaps we should consider that the so-called "great call for the restoration of monarchy" that is Abenomics, implemented through Sanaenomics, has already lit the firestorm that will lead to a major collapse of the Japanese yen and the uncontrollable Reiwa inflation frenzy.

 

However, even if Japanese stocks rise further in the short term, their sustainability is still uncertain. This is because even if the Bank of Japan's policy interest rate remains stagnant for the time being, the twin engines of fiscal and monetary policy will be firing on all cylinders, and concerns about accelerating inflation and a sudden rise in long-term interest rates could hold back Japanese stocks.

 

In any case, Sanaenomics, which displays arrogant ignorance by ignoring even the basics of economics, especially (open) macroeconomics, could cause a momentary explosion in the Tokyo market at the start of the week and ultimately trigger a resurgence of the Truss Shock that occurred in the UK in 2022.

 

Will the yen really only weaken to around 150 yen to the dollar? Furthermore, could it trigger a sudden and uncontrollable depreciation of the yen and appreciation of the dollar, enraging the unorthodox US President Trump?

 

In any case, Japan has been drifting uncharted waters since the transition to a floating exchange rate system in the 1970s, wasting 40 years in vain. As the quadruple challenges of a declining birthrate, long-term stagnation in consumption, a depreciating currency, and rising prices worsen, we cannot help but see it as facing the greatest postwar and unprecedented crisis of Japan's collapse in the fall of 2025.

 

 

Tomo Nakamaru, Former World Bank Economist

Administrative Notice — Update on My English Blog Platform

  Administrative Notice — Update on My English Blog Platform Dear Readers, Thank you very much for following my writings and for your con...