September 2023 Monthly:
The essence of the Bank of Japan's
failure
:
September 25, 2023
Nikkei editorial ``The Bank of Japan
will refine its analysis and dialogue'' excuses the Bank of Japan's failures
The
Nikkei editorial (dated September 23), based on Governor Ueda's remarks at the
press conference after the September 22 monetary policy meeting, which decided
to maintain the status quo, stated, ``As inflation continues to rise, the Bank
of Japan will face difficult monetary policy management.'' We are now at the
crossroads of whether a sustained trend of wage increases will strengthen or
not. We would like to see more precise economic and price analyzes and
judgments about the situation than ever before.''
However,
the company's paper acknowledged Governor Ueda's statement that ``the situation
has not yet reached a point where it is foreseeable that the price stability
target will be achieved in a sustained and stable manner,'' and stated that
``he has once again demonstrated his stance to tenaciously continue monetary
easing,'' adding, ``The key is... The Bank of Japan has expressed its intention
to carefully examine and consider data and information at each meeting,
including the current wage trends.'' It can be said that the Bank of Japan has
expressed its stance of evaluating the results of the Bank of Japan's monetary
policy meeting.
In
addition, the company's theory says, ``As economic and price conditions change,
it is appropriate for the Bank to flexibly update its assessment of the situation
and policy response depending on the data.'' ``I would like to request accurate
and timely information dissemination and dialogue in the future as well,''
sending a message of encouragement to the Bank of Japan.
However,
while that may be true, it is not without problems. Does the Bank of Japan
Ueda's analysis really deserve objective evaluation, as the Nikkei editorial
claims that it is ``flexibly updating information judgments and policy
responses depending on the data''?
Japan's
inflation underestimation bias
For
example, if we add back the effect of government subsidies for electric power
and LNG gas companies that have been introduced since February on prices, the
true price increase rate in Japan would be approximately 1% compared to the previous
year. The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications has officially
calculated in its monthly price statistics that this will increase by a
percentage point.
In
other words, Japan's inflation rate that we are currently seeing is
underestimated by about 1 percentage point compared to the actual inflation
rate.
Therefore,
it should be understood that Japan's current inflation rate is not about 3%
compared to the previous year as claimed by the media, but is moving at about
4%, twice the Bank of Japan's price stability target of 2%.
The
best evidence of this is that the core-core CPI, which excludes fresh food and
energy, which appears to be unaffected by government subsidies for electricity
and natural gas utilities, increased by 4.3% year-on-year in August. It records
the rate.
Continued
reversal of Japan-US inflation rates
Moreover, the difference in the inflation
rates between Japan and the United States has started to reverse since May
2023.
For example, if we compare the overall CPI
in August between Japan and the US, the US CPI year-on-year increase rate is
+3.7%, while Japan's rate of increase appears to be +3.2% at first glance, but
as mentioned above, government subsidies The true price increase rate after
adding back the gold component should be seen as +4.2%, which is an addition of
1 percentage point.
Furthermore, if we compare the producer
price index (PPI), which is an upstream indicator of prices, between Japan and
the US, the US composite PPI in August increased by only 1.6% compared to the
same month last year, while Japan's rose by 3.2% compared to the same month
last year. % increase has been recorded. This apparent reversal of PPI
inflation in Japan and the US suggests that the reversal of Japan-US inflation
rates in the downstream CPI will continue for some time to come.
There
is no way that the Bank of Japan is unaware of the approximately 1% inflation
underestimation bias that has been observed since February 2023, and the
reversal of Japan and US inflation rates since May.
Even
if we were to take a step back and put aside the issue of ``inflation
underestimation bias'' that has been occurring since February, Japan's price
increase rate has changed since the Bank of Japan began setting a concrete
price target in 2013, when it began a new dimension of monetary easing. Looking
at the core CPI, which excludes fresh food, which has been used as an
indicator, it has consistently exceeded the Bank of Japan's 2% price target for
the past 17 months.
Even
though Japan's core CPI has exceeded the price stability target of 2% for the
past 17 months, why does the Bank of Japan say it is not stable, sustainable,
or trending? Is it possible to continue playing around with sophistry?
Bank
of Japan Governor Ueda has clearly stated since shortly after he took office
that the rate of inflation would slow down in the second half of fiscal 2023
and converge toward the 2% inflation target.
Now,
as we approach the second half of fiscal 2023, given Japan's inflation, which
has exceeded the price target of 2% for 17 months and remains clearly high, the
Bank of Japan is By sharing the need for monetary policy revisions and the
steps to be taken to do so as widely as possible with private economic actors
such as households and companies, as well as domestic and foreign financial
markets, we can communicate the Bank of Japan's monetary policy intentions to
private actors and markets. It should be incorporated.
Isn't
that the natural responsibility of Japan's central bank, which is the guardian
of prices and currency?
In
any case, there is no objective basis for the Bank of Japan's assertion that
``the situation has not reached a point where it is foreseeable that the price
stability target will be achieved in a sustained and stable manner,'' and it
cannot be seen that the Bank of Japan is properly fulfilling its
accountability. It's extremely difficult.
The Bank of Japan, chasing the two
rabbits of wages and prices, has not gained any.
Furthermore, wages are not originally a
policy variable that can be controlled by governments or central banks. It is
determined by supply and demand between labor and management in the labor
market based on labor productivity, etc.
There is no problem with Bank of Japan
Governor Ueda's statement that a 2% price increase accompanied by wage
increases has not been achieved. As shown in the chart below, it is clear that
wage increases have been realized on a nominal basis.
It's just that the rate of increase in
wages has not reached the rate of increase in prices.
If prices are stabilized, real wages can
rise, assuming that wages are determined in the labor market. Furthermore, in
the United States, the inflation rate has already fallen due to the cumulative
and large interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, and wages are clearly on
an upward trend in both nominal and real terms.
If the Bank of Japan, like the Federal
Reserve, focuses on price stability, it could be able to kill two birds with
one stone: price stability and real wage growth.
Conversely, if the Bank of Japan chases two
rabbits in terms of wages and prices, it may end up not gaining any.
A
vicious cycle of “tit for tat in wages and prices”
Moreover,
as if to use the delay in wage increases on a real basis, which takes into
account price increases rather than nominal ones, as a ``cover'', they downplay
the high true inflation rate, which has already reached approximately 4%. I
have to say that this is both dishonest and dangerous.
Sooner
or later, our country may fall into the British style of inflation, the vicious
cycle of inflationary spirals between wages and prices, or the ``tit-for-tat in
wages and prices'' that Nikkei has been admiring recently.
In
addition, strikes by auto unions have occurred not only in the UK, but also in
the US, and are becoming more and more prolonged. Workers' dissatisfaction with
rising inflation now appears to be reaching a boiling point even in the world's
major developed countries, which are democratic.
Inflation
gap remains unchanged despite downward revision of Japan's GDP
Furthermore,
on September 19, the Cabinet Office revised down the estimated value of the
"output gap," which is the difference between the Japanese economy's
potential supply capacity and actual demand, for the April-June period of 2023
to +0.1%. However, it remained in positive territory for the first time in 15
quarters.
The
previous estimate of the inflation gap was +0.4%. This is because the revised
GDP figures announced on the 8th were revised downward from the preliminary
figure of 6.0% increase to 4.8% year-on-year growth due to a decline in capital
investment.
An
important fact that remains unchanged even before and after the revision is
that an inflation gap exists, in which aggregate demand exceeds aggregate
supply, not only in terms of prices but also in the real aspects of the
Japanese economy.
If
aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply, leading to an inflationary gap,
should the government roll back the aggregate demand stimulus measures aimed at
eliminating the deflationary gap and shift to an austere fiscal policy? The
current imperative for monetary and fiscal policy authorities is to either
normalize ultra-accommodative monetary policy without delay, or turn to
policies that suppress aggregate demand by implementing, or both at a moderate
pace.
The
Bank of Japan's policy interest rate is bound to go from negative to over 4%.
High
inflation has exceeded the Bank of Japan's price stability target of 2% for the
past 17 months, and the current true inflation rate remains high at around 4%. Although
the output gap is small, aggregate
demand exceeds aggregate supply. Given the growing inflation gap, Bank of Japan
Governor Ueda did not forcefully state, ``At this point, we cannot decide on
the timing or concrete measures for policy revisions.'' It is necessary to take
action.
This
is because the current inflation rate has exceeded the 2% price stability
target for 17 months, and now prices are rising at a high rate of 4%, and the
output gap is more conservative than the inflation gap, and supply and demand
are in equilibrium. Assuming this, the current policy interest rate level that
the Bank of Japan should set is above 4% for the inflation rate, and it is
inevitable that the policy interest rate necessary for the real policy interest
rate to rise to positive territory will be above 4% (on a nominal basis). This
is because you will be able to do it.
In
short, it is now time for the Bank of Japan to lift its current negative policy
interest rate. If there is no hurry to raise interest rates now, we cannot help
but think that there is great fear that the Bank of Japan will be forced to
raise rates even more rapidly and significantly due to rising inflation (see
the chart above).
If the Bank of Japan had worked together
with the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates last April, it would have been
possible to achieve the 2% price stability target! ?
In
fact, if the Bank of Japan had quietly pushed ahead with the normalization of
policy interest rates in April 2022, rather than in the fall of 2023, at the
same time as the Federal Reserve began significantly raising interest rates,
the Bank of Japan would have been able to avoid allowing inflation to exceed
its 2% price stability target. It was very possible that it could have been
done.
However,
due to a different level of monetary easing and repeated large-scale fiscal
moves, as of autumn 2023, high inflation and a balance between supply and
demand in GDP have already been achieved.
This
is the reason why I argued in the August Monthly, ``We can't wait for the Bank
of Japan to raise interest rates!''
Bank of Japan literature as usual
In
any case, does BOJ Ueda's analysis have a fair, transparent, and consistent
``heart'' and ``spirit''?
Any
attempt to engage in dialogue with economic actors and financial markets
through arbitrary, unobjective, and inconsistent ``Bank of Japan literature''
will only resound in vain.
Even
if it insists on detailed analysis and dialogue, if the Ueda Bank of Japan,
which seems to have become a watchdog of the government rather than a watchdog
of prices and currencies, does not have a "heart," then Japan's
monetary policy will naturally be arbitrary. This could create serious doubts
among households, businesses, and the financial market.
Regrettably,
the Ueda Bank of Japan has become increasingly deviated from the rules-based
and reliable monetary policy that is common sense economic theory in developed
countries, led by the United States, and dialogue has naturally become
arbitrary and one-sided. This could lead to a sudden and discretionary major
policy shift, which could cause severe rifts in Japan's national economy and
financial markets.
Unfortunately,
the question is not so much whether such a serious rift will occur, but rather
when it will become inevitable.
What
is the “essence of failure”?
(Nakamaru) Can you
summarize the famous book ``The Essence of Failure'' in about 2,000,000 words?
(Bard) Yes, I'm
smart. Below is a summary of the famous book ``The Essence of Failure'' in
about 2000 words.
The Essence of
Failure is a book published in 1991 that summarizes organizational research on
the Japanese military. Author Ryoichi Tobe and his colleagues analyze the
causes of the Japanese military's failure in war from an organizational
perspective.
The main points of
this book are the following three points.
1. The Japanese
military clung to past successes and was unable to respond to change.
2. The Japanese
military had a strong organizational culture that excluded heresy and chance.
3. The Japanese army
was unable to achieve its war objectives due to a disconnect between strategy
and tactics.
1. They stuck to
their past successes and were unable to adapt to change.
The Japanese army won
an overwhelming victory in the Russo-Japanese War. From this successful
experience, the Japanese military began to adhere to the strategic philosophy
of ``the army goes on the offensive, and the navy goes on the defensive.''
However, in the Pacific War, the American military was unable to continue its
offensive due to its overwhelming physical and technological capabilities.
2. There was a strong
organizational culture that excluded heresy and chance.
The Japanese military
had a strong organizational culture that excluded heresy and coincidence.
Therefore, heretical opinions that proposed new tactics or strategies were not
accepted. Furthermore, with the victory in the Russo-Japanese War, the Japanese
military fell into the illusion that ``Japan was the center of the world,'' and
began to underestimate threats from other countries.
3. There was a
disconnect between strategy and tactics, and the war objectives could not be
achieved.
The Japanese army was
unable to achieve its war objectives due to a disconnect between strategy and
tactics. For example, in the Pacific War, the Japanese military had a strategy
of ``bringing America to its knees.'' However, in order to accomplish that
strategy, an attack on the American mainland was necessary. However, the
Japanese army was unable to achieve its strategy because it did not have
sufficient attack capabilities to attack the American mainland.
The
Global War Against Inflation and the Essence of Reiwa Japan's Failure
(Nakamaru) If we look
at the ``essence of failure'' in the context of the current global fight against
inflation, what kind of story can we draw?
All major G7
countries are currently fighting a war against inflation, but Japan is the only
one that still maintains negative policy interest rates even though the
inflation rate has exceeded the target of 2%.
In the world war
against inflation, it seems to me that a story is approaching in which only
Japan will repeat the essence of its failures and face defeat. Is it unfounded?
(Bard) Yes, I don't
think that is an unfounded concern. It is quite possible that Japan fails to
combat inflation and loses the war against inflation.
In ``The Essence of
Failure,'' Ryoichi Tobe and his colleagues analyze the failures of the Japanese
military by dividing them into the following three elements.
• Stick to past
successes
• Eliminate
heresy and coincidence.
• Discrepancy
between strategy and tactics
These factors also
apply to Japan's current failure to combat inflation.
• Stick to past
successes
Japan has achieved
high economic growth since the war. Based on this successful experience, Japan
has made overcoming deflation a top priority and is taking a cautious stance
toward monetary tightening. However, the nature of the current global inflation
is different from past experiences, and clinging to past successes will cause
inflation countermeasures to fail.
• Eliminate
heresy and coincidence.
Japan has a tendency
to exclude heresy and coincidence. This is thought to be due to the fact that
the government and private companies have worked closely together to advance
economic activities during Japan's post-war period of high economic growth.
However, this trend is a factor that inhibits new ideas and reforms when it
comes to combating inflation.
• Discrepancy
between strategy and tactics
Japan has set a goal
of reducing the inflation rate to 2%, but there is no clear strategy for
achieving that goal. Additionally, current policy does not appear to be having
the necessary effect to achieve the goal of 2% inflation.
The combination of
these factors creates a story in which Japan fails to combat inflation and
loses the war against inflation.
Of course, this is
just a possibility. It is possible that Japan will succeed in combating
inflation and win the war against inflation. However, looking at the current
situation, it seems more likely that Japan will fail in its efforts to combat
inflation.
For Japan to succeed
in combating inflation, the following points are important.
• Be flexible
enough to respond to change without clinging to past success experiences
• Be open to
new ideas and innovations without excluding heresy or chance.
• Clarify
strategies and implement effective policies to achieve the goal of reducing
inflation to 2%.
Future developments
will be closely watched to see whether Japan will be able to overcome these
challenges and succeed in combating inflation.
(Nakamaru) You have a
point. However, as inflation has continued to exceed 2% for the past 17 months,
the Ueda Bank of Japan has continued to implement monetary easing on a
different level, including negative policy interest rates, and the Kishida
second reshuffled cabinet appears that they intend to continue with fiscal
expansion, with structural wage increases and strengthening investment flows.
By the way, the
Japanese economy has turned into an inflation gap where aggregate demand
exceeds aggregate supply. Macroeconomics teaches that in the case of an
inflation gap, measures to suppress aggregate demand should be adopted through
monetary policy, fiscal policy, or both.
Contrary to theory,
on the contrary, if Japan continues to implement measures to stimulate
aggregate demand with extensive monetary and fiscal measures, it will be
inevitable that Japan will suffer another major defeat in the fight against
inflation.
Unfortunately, I cannot help but think that Japan has not yet learned the true nature of failure.
(Bard) Yes, you are
correct. Japan's inflation rate has continued to exceed 2% for the past 16
months. However, the Japanese government and the Bank of Japan have shown a
willingness to continue monetary easing and fiscal expansion.
This attitude is
contrary to macroeconomic theory. When an inflation gap exists, it is necessary
to suppress aggregate demand through monetary policy, fiscal policy, or both.
However, the Japanese government and the Bank of Japan are likely to exacerbate
inflation further by continuing with policies that stimulate aggregate demand.
There is a very high
possibility that Japan will fail in its anti-inflation measures and lose the
fight against inflation. This can be said to be a sign that Japan has not
learned the ``essence of failure.''
For Japan to succeed
in combating inflation, the following points are important.
• Mobilize
monetary and fiscal policies to suppress aggregate demand
• Make the
people understand the need for inflation countermeasures and gain their
cooperation.
Future developments
will be closely watched to see whether the Japanese government and the Bank of
Japan will be able to overcome these challenges and succeed in combating
inflation.
Below are some
possibilities if Japan fails to combat inflation.
• Acceleration of
price increases
• Slower economic
growth
• Deterioration of
people's lives
• Increased social
unrest
These problems could
arise if Japan fails to combat inflation. It is important for the Japanese
government and the Bank of Japan to recognize the risk of failing to combat
inflation and take appropriate measures.
(Nakamaru)
Unfortunately, Bard is right. thank you.
(Bard)
No, you're welcome.
There is a very high
possibility that Japan will fail in its anti-inflation measures and lose the
fight against inflation. This can be said to be a sign that Japan has not
learned the ``essence of failure.''
As you have pointed
out, if the Japanese government and the Bank of Japan fail to take measures to
combat inflation, problems such as an acceleration in price increases, a
slowdown in economic growth, a deterioration in people's lives, and an increase
in social unrest may occur. .
It is important for
the Japanese government and the Bank of Japan to recognize the risk of failing
to combat inflation and take appropriate measures.
Future trends will be
closely watched.
Tomo Nakamaru
Former World Bank
Economist
No comments:
Post a Comment